26 February, 2007

vogue paris

Carine Roitfeld is in trouble. For being too sexy, or too sexual, or even sexist, according to where you stand on the use of fetishism in fashion.
The December/January issue of French Vogue, of which she is editor in chief, had started landing on the doormats of its subscribers when we met in December at Vogue's HQ on rue du Faubourg Saint-Honore in Paris, and the angry phone calls were coming thick and fast. Her assistant answered another three before I'd even taken my seat in Roitfeld's office. The issue had a special guest editor - John Galliano - and came with a calendar for 2007 featuring 13 images of pre-Raphaelite beauty Karen Elson, one of Galliano's favourite models, in skimpy black clothes and tied up with curtain cord. 'Glamour bondage', as Roitfeld put it; nothing more shocking than you'd find in the window of your local Ann Summers, although, obviously, infinitely more stylish. But some of the subscribers 'are furious', she reports. Her slightly frazzled laugh isn't enough to hide the fact that she's annoyed, maybe because she's particularly proud of the images of Elson - which she styled herself.
'I think is beautiful and a bit osé [daring]. Is like a modern Pirelli calendar, non? We try to push. But my assistant is like this with the phone [she holds an invisible receiver at arm's length as if being screamed at] for three days now, listening to insults from feminists. In France, you have Paris, and you have the rest of the country,' Roitfeld says. 'I think the rest of the country don't like us, and we don't know them ... Those who don't like the calendar are not from Paris, they are mostly from the other part of France.' Significantly, she refers to her magazine not as French Vogue, but Vogue Paris. And heaven help Disgusted of Tupin-et-Semons when she finds the picture of John Galliano stark naked in the magazine itself.It's not the first time that Roitfeld's desire 'to push' has shocked sensitive souls. The unconventional way she uses humour to puncture fashion's pretentious tendencies, and sexuality to shake up its conservatism, has on occasion rubbed both her readers and her peers up the wrong way. Her styling in Tom Ford's Nineties reinvention of Gucci quickly picked up the label 'porno chic' for its slinky, sexy, Studio 54-era look. Even a decade ago, shoots with long-time collaborator Mario Testino for style magazine
The Face aroused similar controversy. A hilarious shoot featuring a Princess Anne lookalike in a T-shirt bearing a scored-out 'Diana' sparked letters of complaint about lack of respect for the monarchy and insensitivity (the story appeared just before Princess Diana's death, which was hardly Roitfeld's fault). Another, which cast supermodel Eva Herzigova as a maniacal butcher in a blood-spattered apron playing with pieces of raw meat, also drew flak, particularly the image of her caressing the blade of her meat cleaver.
Of course, such disregard for fashion's forces of conservatism is what makes Roitfeld's work so exciting. Her arrival at French Vogue in 2001 brought a youthful energy to an ageing institution which, she readily admits, 'hadn't been so good' since the mid-Eighties. At that time, Paris was undergoing a wholehearted rejuvenation, with a generation of designers barely into their thirties being appointed as head designers of its most famous fashion houses: Nicolas Ghesquiere at Balenciaga, Hedi Slimane at Dior Homme, Phoebe Philo at Chloe. Roitfeld's appointment at Vogue seemed to anoint the arrival of this new generation. And while her youthful irreverence may have ruffled a few fusty feathers, it has revived the magazine's fortunes: in 2005, advertising revenue leapt 60 per cent, making it the best year for ad sales in two decades. 'I make big errors,' she says modestly, 'and I may be a bit punk sometimes, but I try to make it exciting for the reader. And the readership figure goes up. It will never be 'uge - because if it is 'uge it will be a different sort of magazine, too popular. So I cannot be too big. But we keep going up bit by bit ... the boss is happy.'

The boss must be happy. It was announced last autumn that Roitfeld would be taking over as editorial director of the biannual men's fashion magazine Vogue Hommes International. With her first issue due in March, anticipation as to quite how Roitfeld will reinvigorate the menswear title is growing. She's the first to acknowledge that working on the magazine will not be easy. Its reputation and influence have waned in recent years (that ageing rocker Lenny Kravitz was a recent cover star says it all).'You know, there are a lot of good men's magazines. In England you have Arena Homme+ and Another Man; and in France we have L'Officiel Hommes. But all are looking similar.' In contrast, Vogue Hommes International will be 'more journalistic. OK, there will be a lot of fashion; but a lot of big articles, too. I think it's difficult to do fashion for men, because either you become very over-homosexual fashion or very boring fashion. You don't want a boy who looks 15 in a little pair of shorts with some strange art ... But to see just a jacket and tie is boring.'Also, she points out, she has made sure that '80 per cent' of the stylists on Vogue Hommes are women, because they are better qualified to know what makes a man look attractive. Most crucial of all, she reckons, is the selection of the male faces that will appear in its pages. 'Because men's clothes are less fun, less interesting than women's clothes, non? So I like to use some people who are not models, who are not 16.' Her cover star is being shot a few days after I meet her ('I cannot say the name because I am very superstitious') and the photographer is her old friend Mario Testino: 'He is my good luck.'

Roitfeld and Testino, possibly the most famous fashion photographer in the world, have been working together since the mid-Eighties. Roitfeld claims she had a tendency to be negative before she met him, blaming her 'half-Russian blood'. (Her father was the Russian film producer Jacques Roitfeld - 'I think my craziness and glamour come from him. The Russians are very much more up and down than the French,' she says.) 'Mario gave me positivity because he is South American, so he is full of energy. He pushed me all the time. I don't think I'm any better [as a stylist] than 15 years ago; it is Mario makes me more international, more visible.' Certainly visible enough to catch the attention of designer Tom Ford in the mid-Nineties, when he was trying to revive Gucci's reputation. When Ford first approached Roitfeld and Testino to work with him, they refused. 'But he called, he called, he called. And one day he come to visit us on a shoot and we said, "Oh, he is very good-looking ... Let's do the job with him!"'

Jonathan Newhouse, chairman of Vogue's publisher, Conde Nast International, was similarly keen to offer her the French Vogue job in 2001. This was a completely new departure for Roitfeld, who had been freelance her entire life - first as a writer for French Elle, before turning her hand to styling. 'I never had an office before, never had a chair with a table ... Have never been a boss.' Even now, she's still a stylist, shooting several stories a month for Vogue Paris. 'Daytimes I am editor in chief; after eight and at weekends I am a stylist. It is great! There is no one to criticise my work other than me.'
On the wall of her office hangs a black-and-white portrait of Roitfeld by her friend Karl Lagerfeld. It's iconic Carine: hair swept forward to obscure half her face, her one visible eye framed with smudged eyeliner and topped with a slab of eyebrow. A white thread runs vertically down the left-hand side, suggesting it might be a still from a Super-8 film, in the style of Andy Warhol's Screen Tests. But this imperfection is too perfect: look closer and there are other 'imperfections' - the blocky disruption of pixelation gives the image away as a product of digital technology.

'Very Big Brother, no?' says Roitfeld, noticing me look at it. I'm sure she's referring to Nineteen Eighty-Four, rather than reality TV. 'The cult of personality ... very Russian.' The cult of personality is something Roitfeld knows all about: her five years at French Vogue have seen her influence extend well beyond fashion's inner sanctum. Reflections of her 'smoky-eyes' image have rippled out from catwalks to magazines to shop-window dummies. Never mind that Women's Wear Daily crowned her 'the muse of the moment' or that Vanity Fair listed her as one of the world's best-dressed women; the Sunday Times Style section and ES magazine have devoted pages to anatomising the Roitfeld look. It would be easy to mock the way women's magazines have fussed over her youthful looks, slim figure and rejection of botox, but it has to be said, meeting her face to face, it's hard to believe she's 51, the mother of two grown-up children. She's been lucky, she says, the way her life has panned out. Christian Restoin, her partner of almost 30 years (she prefers the word 'husband' although they're still not married, she says, because 'like most Russians I am very superstitious, and if I don't get married, I don't get divorced'), was the founder and owner of a successful shirt company, giving her 'the luxe of not having to work too much'. One benefit has been the freedom to pick and choose work. 'If you struggle to pay bills, working on advertising you don't like, on magazines you don't like, at the end of the day is difficult to still like fashion. You know, is like when you squeeze a lemon ... whereas I still have some juice.'Another advantage was that she could focus on bringing up her children, while she watched overworked colleagues guiltily juggling motherhood and career-maintenance. 'I only start to work really hard when they grow up. Now I work every day, Saturday, Sunday - but the children are big, they study far away.'
When Tom Ford launched his first scent, Black Orchid, last November, Roitfeld's daughter Julia was chosen to be the star of its advertising campaign. Carine opens an issue of French Vogue and there on the first spread is Julia Roitfeld Restoin, a picture of golden-era Hollywood glamour, holding a bottle of Tom Ford Black Orchid. 'Is strange that Tom decide to choose Julia ...' She frowns sulkily. 'Why not me? Ha ha, I am joking! He didn't want someone well known; he want a new face. Is great, non?' As she looks at the image, for the briefest moment her demeanour of cool fashion editor makes way for a more common expression: that of a mum at a school nativity play. You must be proud, I say, and her usual composure snaps straight back into place. 'Of course you are proud,' she shrugs, 'because is a beautiful picture. But is good for her because it give her some confidence by being chosen. Because maybe is difficult to be my daughter. Because I'm still very photographed, I make my own business, I'm quite successful.'
Julia lives in New York and works for Baron & Baron (an advertising and design company), as well as her own design agency, Global Design Inc: 'She just starting with that and she do some little jobs, like the Christmas card for [fashion designer] Zac Posen, so I am very happy.' Roitfeld's son, Vladimir, was also briefly a model, but these days he prefers student life in the United States. 'It was my friend Hedi Slimane who made him a model when he was 16, but Vladimir did not like it at all.' His brief spell in that world opened his mother's eyes to the less attractive side of the profession, and may even have influenced her decision to use older models in Vogue Hommes International. 'I met some of these guys, they very young, they come from the old part of the world - Argentina, Sweden, east Russia - they don't know anything, they don't know the language and they are not very well treated. Vladi would bring these poor guys home for spaghetti because often they have no money at all, they even don't eat. Is a harder business for boys than for girls, I think.'

Wasn't she once a model herself, I ask. She demurs. 'I was in London and I do a cover for [Eighties fashion mag] Look Now. I was not,' she says, with comic understatement, 'a big top model.' I remind her that she modelled for Kenzo, too. 'Yes, Kenzo loved me, made all the clothes on me.' She laughs. 'It make me very old to say that. Make me an antiquity.'
Roitfeld has been in charge of French Vogue for more than five years now. It was never her ambition to be here, she says; she's never had anything as organised as a career plan. 'I don't think I will do this for my entire life, though. Because I love a challenge.' So where next? She might return to writing, she offers, to write a movie script about fashion, because no film has managed to portray the industry realistically. She saw The Devil Wears Prada, although not entirely of her own volition. 'I don't go to the cinema often, I don't have the time. But I saw it on the plane. I think Meryl Streep is amazing, but I don't think it's the reality of fashion.'

On the subject of ambition, I venture, in The Devil Wears Prada the editor of French Runway (for Runway read Vogue) has her eye on the editor's role at American Runway ... Is that a job Roitfeld would want?
'The ultimate Vogue to do would be the American Vogue, because it's 'uge ...' She sounds almost tempted, before saying, repeatedly, what a great job she thinks Anna Wintour is doing. Roitfeld knows first hand: she worked at US Vogue as a stylist in the late-Nineties. She considers the idea again before making her mind up. 'I have more fun doing my magazine. We French, we small! We can smoke on the cover, we can show tits, we can do crazy calendar; we have a lot of freedom that they don't have in America. I think I would be very frustrated not to be able to do all my craziness that I'm able to do here in France.'


by Murray Healy

24 February, 2007

Razor's Edge


"Of course there can be desire without love. Desire isn't passion. Desire is the natural consequence of the sexual instinct and it isn't of any more importance than any other function of the human animal.

Unless love is passion, it's not love, but something else; and passion thrives not on satisfaction, but on impediment. What d'you suppose Keats meant when he told the lover on his Grecian urn not to grieve? "Forever wilt thou love, and she be fair!" Why? Because she was unattainable, and however madly the lover pursued she still eluded him. For they were both imprisoned in the marble of what I suspect was an indifferent work of art.

Passion doesn't count the cost. Pascal said that the heart has its reasons that reason takes no account of. If he meant what I think, he meant that when passion seizes the heart it invents reasons that seem not only plausible but conclusive to prove that the world is well lost for love."
- W. Somerset Maugham
The Razor's Edge

jade jagger







19 February, 2007

Pearl Lowe



Wild!












stills from Wild! by Bobbi Woods at the Art Center Graduate Gallery in Pasadena California

March Madness...

18 February, 2007

March of Innocents

March of Innocents
- by Anna Bayle


There were two hundred and twelve fashion shows crammed into a week of the New York 2007 Fall collections. Taking an average of 15 to 20 models per show (a low estimate), that would make about 3000 to 3500 models pounding the pavements of New York to go to their go-sees, fittings, shows at Bryant Park and elsewhere.


In the past, New York City was the last stop for models; it was the pinnacle of one’s modeling career when one has arrived in New York. Models had to prove themselves first in Paris or Milan, the other important fashion meccas, but all that has changed. New York now precedes the European collections in the fashion calendar. And with the huge increase in the number of fashion shows presented in New York, the city has become what Milan used to be in the 80’s. Castings are done days before a press show and models are hired on the spot.
With only about 10 top modeling agencies providing the models for the shows today (top ranking would be IMG and DNA), modeling has become a big business, not so much for the high modeling rates but because of sheer volume. What was once a city where only the best worked; it has now become a center where the newest and the youngest come to try their fortune. New models come to town and the agencies send them straight to fashion show castings, much like the way they cast fashion shows in Europe. Designers choose from the new faces, not sure that the girls are seasoned walkers or that they will even be any good in front of a live audience. Still, designers put their faith in the professional modeling agencies that send the girls and assume the job will be done. Inside sources informed me that some unscrupulous agencies, yank the models from a ‘not so known’ designer the night before the show for a better paying job.


Gone are the days when the models were paid by the hour and only the crème de la crème were hired in New York. In the late nineties, New York has reverted to the way fashion shows have been cast in Europe and now the models are paid by the show. The modeling rates range from $500 to $4000 a show for 3 to 4 hours work. Once in a while, a designer like Carolina Herrera will pay $6000 for a model, according to an inside source. That is a low figure considering that at the height of ‘model mania’, the going rate was $10000 a fashion show.

THE MODELS

The cadre of models who did the New York collections is a beautiful group of young women in their prime--their skin flawless, their eyes wide with excitement and energy. These young models all seem to know that their job is to sell the clothes and to look beautiful on the runway. A lot of them are from Eastern Europe and some of them could not even speak English but they managed to go to their jobs and do some sightseeing in the Big Apple, subway maps in tote. The oldest model that I interviewed was 22 and she looked 16. Their ages ranged from is 16-22.

The models are, indeed, all gorgeous…they are Paulina Poriskova’s look-alikes; huge symmetrical faces, heavy jaws and deep set round eyes. What is also most interesting is the mixture of beauties, a truly international hodgepodge of facial features: Brazil, Canada, Ukraine, Sweden, China, Poland, Korea. However, according to Oscar Reyes, a booker at Elitemodels who has been watching models for more than 30 years, “They are more like Victorian dolls than sex vamps. They are kids.” “There was a time when even with the lights down, I could tell who was walking on the runway…I can’t tell one from the other now even with the lights on.”

As for their style of modeling, it is ‘march in’ and ‘march out’. We can attribute that to the great Rei Kawakubo of Comme des Garcon who started this trend in the early 80’s. Now all of the shows have the same format. You will be happy to note though, that the ‘horse walk’, reminiscent of Naomi Campbell and Gisele Bundchen, with a kind of right kick has been phased out.

Many fashion veterans (runway photographers, stylists, fashionistas) have been telling me that modeling has changed and that the fashion shows have become so boring and robot-like. Fashion designers opted for the simple parade of their garments and a march or procession, indeed, is what they have. They do not want anything to take away from their clothes anymore and so they choose beautiful young women who will just march in and out. As for the evolution of the fashion model, since this is what the designers wanted, the latest quality of the models reflects that. Yes, they are beautiful, but that’s about it. Modeling agency sources tell me the models are less professional and the life span of models shorter. They have become disposable with a career life span of 2 to 3 years where they will easily be replaced by the youngest and the newest.

In a way, I understand why the magazines covers do not feature models anymore. I have interviewed many visible fashion habitués, present in all fashion shows and they all have the same lament. “The models do not have the personalities.” ‘Nondescript’ and ‘generic’ are the most common comments. I am sure some of these models have personality, like a very friendly and peppy Australian model named Miranda from Sydney. As for the issue of weight….what issue? They all look perfectly healthy and fine, the ones in New York shows anyway. They just lack heft. Oh, their weight is fine but the extra ‘umph’…the personality….is missing. I was backstage and I saw Carol Alt and the original Giselle (also from Brazil, who is known for the headiest laughter backstage). Give me those girls to watch on the runway anytime, because I know I will be in awe or I will be amused. Whatever it is…I will not be bored.

Fashion designers might believe otherwise, but their clothes would look more interesting to us when worn by personalities who have lived their lives and not fashion soldiers who march on. Still, watching the fashion shows, we are appeased by the beauty of youth, the hint or promise of a woman-to-be, and the spirit of pure innocence. At the very least, the models exude a quiet strength. As the audience takes in each model coming down the runway, one can get a whiff of a woman emerging.


After taking a long hard look, I realize that fashion requires nothing of models these days, but their youth and their innocence. Glamour, talent and personality is aptly provided for by the media stars, the singers and the actresses –the Cristina Aguileras, the Beyonces, the Paris Hiltons, the Julia Roberts, and the Scarlett Johanssons. The fashion show has evolved into the march of the innocents. Perhaps, in the next cycle of fashion’s evolution, when the clothes become more interesting and less commercial, and the consumer clamors for glamour and excitement then fashion will dictate a different breed of beauties to replace these homogenized fashion soldiers.

from paris

16 February, 2007

The Naked one

Since the model of perfection is repatriated in subjective interiority, the human body profanes can itself become the vehicle of the Image in conformity. This moment, we saw it, is that of the Rebirth. With the research of the harmony and proportions, the thought of the image enters thus what one called “the era of the Beautiful”. Through the dialectical one enters outside and the interior, the Beautiful can indeed be read like a secularization of the diagram of the Image in conformity. As physics galiléenne undertakes géométriser space and to reduce the objects to vectors of force, painting proposes to base the visible beauty of the human body on an interior harmony.



It is in the Naked one that this search of the Beautiful finds its ground privileged. The Naked one, contrary to nudity, is indissociable of a spiritualization of the body, because just as there is science of the proportions only human body (and not of the animal body), there is Naked the only human one. The Naked one is not thus nor the nudity of the creature, nor the opacity of the animal body, nor flesh of the sexué body; it is quite to the contrary denial (or the refusal) most extremely. Like beautiful ideal, the body escapes organic time and crystallizes in an immutable presence subjected to the only law of the form (thus with the only law of the model). The Naked one becomes thus, like François Julien (Julien, 2001) recalls, the theatre where come to abolish all the oppositions, all tensions, in which is taken the report/ratio that Europe maintains with the body and the image: sensitive vs spiritual, matter vs form, temporality vs eternity, perception vs Idée.
But this decorum of Naked and the imitation of the “beautiful nature” is worried by the “other body” and another image which do not cease following the ideal body and the image in conformity like their cursed share. If the beautiful ideal falls under the filiation of the ascending way like spiritualization of the body, what arrives when the image of the body borrows the down line?
What arrives it, for example, when the body takes figure under a wishing glance, thus when it is sexué? It then ceases being placed under the glance of spiritual interiority and is put under that of another body: the beautiful ideal is replaced by the trade of the body placed under the sign of the scopic impulse. The sexuation of the body - and particularly of the female body - from time immemorial was thus a danger to the Naked one, that of the risk to see the beautiful image déchoir in pornography.
Sometimes it is the idea even of the existence of a subjacent model which becomes source of interrogation: and if, instead of being the sign of an internal harmony, was the appearance of the body - the image - only the trace immanente this to appear itself? The photographic image is one of the places where this possibility of an image without depth did not cease levelling. Its double nature of print and analogical image to some extent predestines it with that. By technical need it is indeed a print of the body in its physical being, sexué and social most immediate and most opaque. Each time it remains faithful to this specificity which characterizes it, it demolishes the idea even beautiful ideal, giving to see the body in the been obstinated being. On another side, counting on the effect of reality induced by knowledge that we have of his statute of print coupled with the effect of its analogical power, the photographic image is able, better than any other image, to give the exchange, to make up reality: insipidity of the skins of the erotism “software”, assuaged bodies of the advertising ideals, sanitarianism of the nudity celebrated by totalitarian propaganda…, as many fictions which singent the image in conformity, celebrating the improbable coincidence of reality and ideal.

11 February, 2007

VALENTINES DAY+++MirrorPhase & Diana Thater

wild is never boring in the jungle of ove and affection





monkey business in the jungle of love and affection!
hahaha aaaaaahhhhhhhhh! ...and the zebra's!!!! we also need chinchillas
-don't cha think?




Love Is The Drug

Lyrics to the song Love Is The Drug as recorded by Roxy Music.

(Ferry/MacKay)

T'ain't no big thing to wait for the bell to ring
T'ain't no big thing the toll of the bell

Aggravated, spare for days I troll downtown the red light place
Jump up bubble up, what's in store love is the drug and I need to score

Showing out, showing out, hit and run
Boy meets girl, where the beat goes on
Stitched up tight, can't shake free
Love is the drug, got a hook on me

Oh catch that buzz love is the drug I'm thinking of
Oh can't you see?
Love is the drug for me

Oh oh

Late that night I park my car stake my place in a singles bar
Face to face, toe to toe heart to heart as we hit the floor
Lumber up, limbo down the locked embrace, the stumble round
I say go, she say yes dim the lights, you can guess the rest

Oh catch that buzz love is the drug I'm thinking of
Oh can't you see love is the drug got a hook in me

Oh catch that buzz love is the drug I'm thinking of
Oh can't you see love is the drug for me

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh
Love is, love is, love is the drug





People like you find it easy, Naked to see, Walking on air. Hunting by the rivers, Through the streets, Every corner abandoned too soon, Set down with due care. Don't walk away in silence, Don't walk away.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++



Valentines DAY!
MIRROR PHASE
avec/sans Diana Thater
u love--oui?!

Mandrake
2692 S La Cienega Blvd
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(between Venice Blvd and Washington Blvd)
9:30 PM-12:30 AM
time of love

08 February, 2007

I have nothing left to translate

“An outstretched hand…”
From Fragment to Fragmentary
Leslie Hill

A hand outstretched, refused, which in whatever manner we would not be able to grasp. [Une main qui se tend, qui se refuse, que de toute manière nous ne pourrions saisir.]
Blanchot, Le Pas au-delà
A hand, perhaps yours or mine, hers or his, extends itself or is ex-tended, and reaches out. In that selfsame gesture, or shortly after, it with-draws, retreats, and resists. Not given, not taken: the hand, it seems, has always already eluded our grip.
But what is at stake in this meeting or missed encounter, this contact or loss of contact between one hand and another?

In other words, what is the reach . the extent, import, and address . of the gesture described and enacted by Blanchot.s fragmentary words? And what is it that Blanchot hands on to us, his readers, or down to us, who are last to speak? But who are we?















I have nothing left to translate
Into the figures of night
Or the pale geometry
Of the fire-birds.
If I once had a wagon of lights to ride in
The axle is broken
The horses are shot.
T. Merton